The V.League and the Foundation After ASEAN Cup 2026: What the Scoreline Does Not Tell
Core answer: Chức vô địch ASEAN Cup 2024 của Việt Nam dựa trên nền tảng V.League nhưng vẫn phụ thuộc vào tiền đạo nhập tịch Nguyễn Xuân Son, phơi bày lỗ hổng đào tạo trung phong nội địa và bất cập trọng tài, VAR kéo dài nhiều mùa. Key facts: - Việt Nam thắng Thái Lan 3-2 ở lượt về ngày 5/1/2025, vô địch ASEAN Cup với tổng tỉ số 5-3. - Nguyễn Xuân Son (Rafaelson) ghi 2 bàn ở lượt đi và mở tỉ số lượt về trước khi chấn thương. - V.League 2024/25 khởi tranh tháng 9/2024 với 14 đội, cung cấp gần như toàn bộ quân số đội tuyển. - VAR được đưa vào V.League từ mùa 2023 nhưng chưa phủ khắp các trận vì chi phí và thiếu nhân lực. Source: Phân tích dựa trên dữ liệu công khai của ASEAN Cup 2024 (chung kết tháng 1/2025) và V.League 2024/25 | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn Related Q&A: Q: Việt Nam vô địch ASEAN Cup năm nào? A: Năm 2024, trận chung kết kết thúc tháng 1/2025, thắng Thái Lan 5-3 tổng tỉ số. Q: V.League đã có VAR chưa? A: Có, từ mùa 2023, nhưng chưa triển khai đầy đủ ở mọi trận. Q: Ai là tiền đạo chủ lực của đội tuyển Việt Nam? A: Nguyễn Xuân Son (Rafaelson), tiền đạo nhập tịch gốc Brazil.
On the night of January 5, 2026, on the turf of Rajamangala in Bangkok, Nguyen Xuan Son collapsed after a collision. He had just scored a brace in the first leg, had just opened the scoring in the second, and then an injury forced him off the pitch on a stretcher amid the choked roar of tens of thousands of Vietnamese. Vietnam still beat Thailand 3-2, winning the ASEAN Cup 5-3 on aggregate. But the moment a naturalized striker carried the entire attack and then fell posed a question bigger than the trophy. I sat there long after the match, hearing the loudspeakers blend with the fans' voices, and asked myself: what did we win with, and is it sustainable?
The answer does not lie in Bangkok. It lies in the V.League.
Vietnam's national team entered the regional tournament with a new head coach, Kim Sang-sik, who took over in mid-2026 after two contrasting reigns under Park Hang-seo and Philippe Troussier. Park built a disciplined defensive block with lightning counterattacks. Troussier tried to impose a European-style possession game and failed, costing the team both its identity and its belief. Kim Sang-sik arrived with a dual task: to heal the dressing room and to rediscover a style the domestic players could actually execute.
The 2026/25 V.League kicked off in September 2026 with 14 teams. Familiar names such as Thep Xanh Nam Dinh, Cong An Ha Noi, Hanoi FC, Hoang Anh Gia Lai and SHB Da Nang remain the backbone. The league supplies almost the entire national squad, and it is also where every problem surfaces: a congested schedule, deteriorating pitches, refereeing quality, and a widening gap between the leading group and the rest. Watching the V.League for years, I have noticed a rule: the champion is usually the team with the best squad depth, not the one with the brightest star.
In the championship squad, most of the pillars grew up in the V.League itself. Nguyen Quang Hai, Nguyen Hoang Duc, Nguyen Tien Linh, Do Hung Dung — all are products of the domestic football environment, forged through hundreds of league matches. That is the strength: the V.League, despite its shortcomings, still produces players with enough character to compete at the regional level. Far from home, every goal is a thread connecting back to the homeland — and those goals were mostly nurtured on domestic pitches.

But looking deeper, there is a paradox. While the midfield and defense rely on domestic resources, the attack depends on a naturalized element. Xuan Son — the Vietnamese name of Rafaelson — is the typical case. A Brazilian striker who came to the V.League, scored steadily, was naturalized and became the national team's number one center-forward. In the first leg of the final, he scored both goals. In the second, he opened the scoring before his injury. Without him, could Vietnam have won? The question is not meant to deny the collective effort, but to point out a gap: we have not produced enough domestic strikers of sufficient caliber.
The core of the problem is this: a football nation is only sustainable when its national team's attack is nurtured by its own domestic league, not by naturalization deals signed at the last minute. This is nothing new. For years, Vietnamese football has struggled with the center-forward problem. Generations such as Cong Phuong, Van Toan and Tien Linh are all talented, but none reached the consistency of a true number nine at regional level over a long period. When the domestic league cannot produce strikers, the national team is forced toward naturalization — a stopgap that works in the short term but never touches the root.
Alongside that is the story of refereeing and VAR, an issue I have followed for years. The V.League introduced VAR in the 2026 season, but it still does not cover every match due to cost and a shortage of personnel. Disputes over disallowed goals, ambiguous offside calls and controversial red cards appear regularly. What I have realized across many seasons: VAR does not make controversy disappear. It merely moves controversy from the pitch to the review room and the grey areas of the law. When a decision is reviewed over and over for minutes, fans' trust does not rise — it shifts into a different, subtler form of doubt.
Based on my experience covering matches, whenever the V.League enters its closing stretch, pressure on referees spikes. Relegation-threatened teams play harder, title-chasing teams play tighter, and every decision is examined under a magnifying glass. The 2026/25 season is no exception. The race between Thep Xanh Nam Dinh and Cong An Ha Noi shows that squad depth is deciding the crown more than any single flash of brilliance.
There is a popular reading after the title: Vietnamese football is back, Kim Sang-sik has found the formula, and the future is wide open. This reading sounds reasonable but overlooks one detail: regional rivals are weakening. Thailand is wrestling with a generational transition and internal instability. Indonesia is pushing mass naturalization but has yet to gel into a unit. Malaysia and the Philippines have not made the leap. The trophy came at the right time, but the right time does not mean sustainable.

The bigger blind spot lies elsewhere. While the whole country celebrates, few ask about the price of the current youth-development model. Academies such as HAGL, PVF and Nutifood were once praised, but their output is thinning. Many families put their children into football hoping for a better life, only to realize that only a tiny fraction reach the top. Behind every ticket into a youth team is a gamble, and behind every failed gamble is a family struggling to cope. The dressing room is never silent, only we are not still enough to hear it — and the sighs of eliminated children never make the news.
So, looking back at the title, what I keep is not the moment of lifting the cup, but the image of Xuan Son leaving the pitch. It reminds me that a football nation cannot live forever on stopgaps, however brilliantly they shine. An empty stadium still echoes with the sound of two years ago — and that echo is asking us a question we have not answered: without Xuan Son, who will we rely on?
